After the death of the Prophet (saw) a prominent Sahabi
Malik Numera was killed for not paying Zakat.
Is there any law in Islam condemn a Muslim to be killed if
refuse to pay Zakat?
In addition after Malik was killed, immediately his wife was
raped. To cover up, the word used instead of rape was that
the she was married to the person who raped her.
Under which Islamic law allow a
Muslim to kill a Muslim and at the same day married his wife
without edah (days require to remain unmarried after the
death of a husband) and without her approval?
Abu baker, Umar and Uthman
We have the right to ask “Ahl al-Sunnah wal Jama‘a” this
question. Rather, we
challenge them to bring about one Qur’anic verse, or one
hadith, making it compulsory on the Muslims to love Abu Bakr
or Umar or Uthman or any other sahabi!
Conspiracy at Saqifa
We do not agree and reject THE SECRET MEETING OF SAQIFA
which happened without the awareness and knowledge of the
Muslim Ummah. Only few people met there, made their own
decisions and selected their own man among themselves. Worst
in this meeting the discussion was about the tribalism NOT
ISLAM. There are several questions have risen in this
meeting which require A TRUE MUSLIM TO ANSWER THEM.
When the second caliph came to be informed about the meeting
in Saqifa, why he came in
secret in the mosque and informed only two people Abu Baker
and Abu Ubaida?
Among all the Muslims in the mosque he only selected Abu
Baker and Abu Ubaida. Other
important Companions of the Holy Prophets (s.a.w) did not
have the right to attend that meeting?
How can he left out Ali at the time the Holy Prophet (s.a.w)
said "Ali mal Haq wal Haq ma Ali?"
How can he left out Salman at the time the Holy Prophet (s.a.w)
said "Salman minal Ahle Bait?"
How can he left out Khuzaima Ibne Thabit (Dhush-Shahadatain)
at the time the Holy Prophet (s.a.w) said that his witness
is equal to two people? Was he not important and necessary
at the serious moment?
How can he left out Ammar Yasir at the time the Holy Prophet
(s.a.w) said that he would be killed by rebellious, meaning
How can he left out Abu Dhar at the time the Holy Prophet (s.a.w)
said “Heaven has not shaded, nor has the earth carried a
person more straight forward than Abu Dhar. He walks on
earth with the immaterialistic attitude of Jesus, the son of
How soon Omar and his friends forgot the saying of the Holy
Prophet (s.a.w) "Paradise longs for three men, Ali, Ammar
Other Muslims particular those who were at the Mosque,
did not have the Feeling of
Safety and Love for Islam, only those few people felt the
The event of Ghadir Khum just passed only few days before
Saqifa took place which they Abu Bakr, Omar and Abu Ubaida
were present and heard what the Holy Prophet (s.a.w) said.
They not only heard what the Holy Prophet (s.a.w) said, but
they were the first people to congratulate Ali (a.s).
Was it possible that they
quickly forgot this Important event and Hadith of Holy
Prophet (s.a.w) of Ghadir Khum and rushed to Saqifa?
If Abu Bakr, Omar and Abu Ubaida did not have ANY DESIRE for
Caliphate, what made them to
leave the Dead Body of the Last Holy Prophet (s.a.w) and
Beloved of Allah aside without attending his Funeral?
We know that after the death of Omar, there was three days
gaps and then a Caliph was selected.
Why could they not delay the
selection of Caliphate to take place after the burial of the
Holy Prophet (s.a.w)?
The same Abu Ubaida bin Jarrah was a grave digger for the
Muslim of Makkah. How he
managed to leave such a golden opportunity to dig the grave
of the Holy Prophet (s.a.w) and ran for the selection of
Which one was it important for Abu Ubaida the golden
opportunity to dig the grave of the Holy Prophet (s.a.w) or
the worldly power of Caliphate?
Since when the Holy Prophet (s.a.w) in his life ever
attended Saqifa and sent any delegation there?
Were not the same Saqifa which was infamous and the secret
meeting place of the criminals to discuss their bad
Was the Mosque not preferable and the right place for the
selection of the Khilafa than Saqifa?
The Mosque did not have enough space for the Muslim
gathering so they should go to Saqifa?
The decision of war, peace, people coming to the Holy
Prophet (saw), lecture and the solving of Muslim problems
during the time of the Holy Prophet (s.a.w) was taking place
in Saqifa or in the Mosque?
Why during debate in Saqifa, there were not mentioned any
Quranic verses or the Holy Prophet (saw) traditions?
The Holy Prophet (saw) tried his best to remove the problem
of tribe and treated all Muslims equal,
if this was the selection of the Muslim Khalifa why the
subject of tribelism was brought forward in this meeting?
Was it not conspiracy that Omar prepared a speech instead
Abu Baker read exactly what Omar wanted?
Volume 8, Book 82, Number 817:
Narrated Ibn 'Abbas:
When the speaker had finished, I intended to speak as I had
prepared a speech which I liked and which I wanted to
deliver in the presence of Abu Bakr, and I used to avoid
provoking him. So, when I wanted to speak, Abu Bakr said,
'Wait a while.' I disliked to make him angry. So Abu Bakr
himself gave a speech, and he was wiser and more patient
than I. BY ALLAH, HE NEVER MISSED A SENTENCE THAT I LIKED IN
MY OWN PREPARED SPEECH, BUT HE SAID THE LIKE OF IT OR BETTER
THAN IT SPONTANEOUSLY.
Traditions in praise of Abu Baker, Umar and Uthman
There are several traditions in praise of Abu Baker, Umar
and Uthman. If truly those traditions were genuine, then in
Saqifa was the right place and right time to bring forward
those traditions in their favour against those who opposed
Abu Baker and Umar and to give strength for their selection
of a Khalifa. Why Abu Baker
or Umar never brought forward any traditions regarding them
if they were truly existed in their favour and Prophet (saw)
said regarding them?
Similar, if truly those traditions in praise of Abu Baker,
Umar and Uthman, were genuine, then in Mubahila those type
of people who were very closed to Allah where Allah
could quickly and easily accept their Duas were required,
where were they during Mubahila
against Christians where by their Dua can wipe out
Collection and transmission of Prophet's traditions (Sunnah)
The three Caliphs, Abu Bakr, 'Umar and 'Uthman, prohibited
the writing and even the discussion of the traditions of the
Abu Bakr gathered the people during his Caliphate and said
to them: "You relate traditions from the Prophet of God and
differ about it. The people after you will differ even more,
[therefore] do not relate anything from the Prophet. If
anyone asks you, say: 'Between us there is the book, so
consider as lawful what is lawful in it, and prohibit what
is forbidden in it'".
Similarly, 'Umar was another one who forbade the people from
narrating traditions from the Prophet. Qarza b. K'ab said:
"When 'Umar b. al-Khattab sent us to Iraq, he walked with us
and said: 'Do you know why I followed you?' They said: 'To
honour us'. He said: 'Besides that, you are going to the
villagers. The Qur'an reverberates in them like the
reverberation of a bee. Do not occupy them with traditions.
So make them busy and recite the Qur'an, and reduce the
narrations from the Prophet and I am an associate to you [in
Then 'Uthman came after him. He continued the trend and
notified all the people that: "It is not permitted for
anyone to narrate a tradition which was not heard during the
times of Abu Bakr and 'Umar".
Since the interests of the ruling authority and the dominant
political line dictated the obliteration and the burning of
the Sunnah and the prohibition of quoting hadith, the sahaba
who supported such caliphate obeyed those orders and burnt
such Sunnah and ceased quoting hadith. Thus, they left
themselves and their followers no option except resorting to
personal views expressed as ijtihad, or following the "sunnah"
of Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Mu`awiyah, Yazid, Marwan ibn al-Hakam,
al-Waleed ibn Abd al-Malik, Sulayman ibn Abd al-Malik....
This continued till [Umayyad caliph] Umar ibn Abd
al-Aziz came to power and asked Abu Bakr al-Hazmi to write
down what he remembered of the ahadith and Sunnah of the
Messenger of Allah or the "sunnah" of Umar ibn al-Khattab.
How come they started transmitting and collecting the
traditions (Sunnah) of the Prophet (saw) after they were
forbidden and prevented by Abu Baker, Umar and Uthman not to
Why they follow their Sirahs and all their sayings with the
exception of this prohibition of traditions collections and
started collecting and transmitting Prophet (saw)'s
traditions against the wishes of their leaders Abu Baker,
Umar and Uthman?
Can those traditions which were compiled by "Ahl al-Sunnah
wal Jama`ah" be taken for granted especially since those who
compiled them belonged to Banu Umayyah and their supporters
who represent Quraysh's caliphate?
Let us take example of Imam Ali (a.s) and Abu Huraira in
Bukhari and see who provide more hadith of Holy Prophet (s.a.w)
Total number of traditions in 9 volumns of Bukhari:
I do not think it require any comment, just question,
do you follow Ali (a.s) who is
part of Ahlel Bait and whom you are told to follow him in
Hadith Thaqalain or Abu Huraira?
How in short time, around two years Abu Huraira could have
such hadith and supersede Imam Ali who since childhood live
his life with the Prophet (saw)?
Examples of Traditions devalued the Prophet (saw)
Can learn Sunni scholars carry their wives in their
shoulders in public and dancing with them as they accept the
tradition which claimed that the Holy Prophet (saw) did
that, can they do this?
Can learn Sunni scholars urinate in public while standing as
they accept the tradition which claimed that the Holy
Prophet (saw) did that, can they do this?
Jabr and Qadr
How can you then accept traditions, reported in Sahih al-Bukhari
and Sahih Muslim, that Allah has preordained the actions of
His slaves before He [even] created them?
Al-Bukhari has reported in his Sahih: "Adam and Moses argued
with each other. Moses said to Adam: 'O Adam! You are our
father who disappointed us and turned us out of paradise'.
Then Adam said to him: 'O Moses! Allah favored you with His
talk (talked to you directly) and He wrote [the Torah] for
you with His Own Hand. Do you blame me for an act which
Allah had written in my fate forty years before my
creation?' So Adam confuted Moses, Adam confuted Moses, the
Prophet added, repeating the statement three times".
How can we believe in this religion which petrifies human
reasoning, [teaching] the human being is a puppet which the
hand of fate moves according to its wishes, only to put it
into an oven later on? This belief which prevents the human
mind from creation, discovery, invention, progress and
competition which have brought about such wonderful things;
and leaves a person stagnant and contented with the state he
is in and with what he has, claiming that he is proceeding
towards what has been decreed for him?
How can we accept these traditions which conflict with sound
reason and portray a picture that Allah, Glory be to Him, is
the Creator, Almighty, Strong and Overpowering and it is up
to Him to create weak slaves so as to put them into the hell
fire simply because He does what He wills?
Do the intelligent beings call this Lord a wise, merciful or
What would happen if we discuss this with non-Muslim erudite
scholars and they know that our Lord has these attributes
and that our religion has decreed misery upon the people
before they were born, will they then accept Islam and enter
into the religion in great numbers?
Fatima with 2 caliphs
If the tradition which Abu Bakar claimed to hear that the
Prophet (saw) said "We prophets do not leave behind any
legacy; whatever we leave as inheritance is charity" (i.e.,
the property of umma), then
how possible Aisha could inherit the house and allow Abu
Baker and Umar to buried there and Fatimah (as) has no right
Which right or under which law could Aisha allow Abu Baker
and Umar to be buried there while Fatimah (as) or
Imam Hassan could not be buried there?
Ali with 3 Caliphs
Ahl al-Sunnah wal Jama‘a” call Uthman
justifying it by saying that he had married Ruqayya and Ummu
Kulthoom who, according to them, were the Prophet’s
daughters. This is not true.
The truth is that they were his step-daughters. Even
if you suppose [erroneously] that they were his daughters,
how can they be described as “noorayn,” two lights, since
the Prophet never narrated any of their merits?
Why not attach this title to Fatima whom he described as the
Leader and the light of all the women of the world? Why did
they not call Ali “Dhul-Noor” based on such a premise?
Why Ali (a.s) was not given any authority in the government
of the first three Caliph?
Rebellion against Imam Ali
The late Wahabie scholar Sayyid Abul A’la Maudoodi ,
in his book “Murtad ki Saza” (Punishment of the apostate)
states that those who did not pay Zakat became apostates
because they rebelled against the Khalifa of the time.
Murtad ki Saza, page 24 – 25 Karachi edition 1954
Curiously when the companions
rebel against Ali (as) and wage war against him the same
thinking is not applied.
How can we comprehend [the fact that] Mu'awiya, the freed
man, son of a freed man and accursed son of the accursed
one, ascending the Caliphate, [a position] which represented
the status and the Caliphate of the Prophet of Allah,
Why sunnis try to damage the character of Abu Talib, this
great man while they are happy to accept that people like
Abu Sufyan and Moaviya were UNQUESTIONABLY(!!!!!) pious
Real Prophet (saw) Successors (Imams)
There are two type of the hadith of Thaqalain, one says “Kitab
and Sunnah” and other “Kitab and Itrat Ahlel Bait.” If you
try all your best to search all Sahih books, you will not
find hadith of “Kitab and Sunnah” anywhere except in Muwatta
of Imam Malik which is without any ASNAD (Chains). It is
only one person saying. While if you try to find “Kitab and
Itrat Ahlel Bait” you find that it has been told by more
than 20 Sahabas. Hadith which has come from more than 6
Sahaba this one becomes as “Hadith Mutawatir.”
Why “hadith Mutawatir” which is like verse of Holy Quran has
been ignored and other one without Asnad (Chains) has been
embraced and treated as first class?
If we accept the hadith of “Kitab and Itrat Ahlel Bait”,
why we do not treat Ahlel Bait
the way we treat Quran? Meaning why we do not
take their guidance and their sayings rather than going
through other channels to get Sunnah of the Holy Prophet (s.a.w)
which resulted many contradicting sayings and in turn it
splintered into different schools, groups, offshoots?
None of the Prophet’s (saw) wives or Banu Hashim ever
claimed this verse 33 of chapter Al-Ahzab was revealed for
them. But Ayesha and Umme Salma themselves have admitted and
agreed to say that the Prophet (saw) has taken Ali, Fatima,
Hassan and Hussain wrapped them under the cloak and then
call 'These are MY AHLEL BAIT’.
How could then other claim that
this verse was revealed for the wives of the Prophet (saw)
During Mubahila against Christians, why did Prophet (s.a.w)
not select even one of Sahabis (companions) or one of his
wives? Where were those great Sahabis (companions) or wives
of the Prophet (saw) who by their Dua could wipe out
The Holy Prophet (s.a.w) said: "Man mata walam yaarifu
Imamul Zaman mata mita Jahilia."
“Whosoever dies without recognizing the Imam of his time
dies the death of the jahiliyyah.”
- Ahmad b. Hanbal, al Musnad, p. 96, Kanzul Ummal, Sharah-e-
Who is Imam of Our
We know that Christians has number 666, if you able to know
this number you will know who is this BEAST meaning DAJJAL.
This Dajjal was never mentioned by name only by number. In
this way the Christians try their best to suit anyone to
this number, even our Holy Prophet (s.a.w) was not spared.
You will see that Pope was called as Beast by Protestant,
Henry Kissinger and now even the government of American
included to be Beast of number 666.
If we come to the Muslims we will see this type of game is
also there. The Muslims has number 12 and this is according
the Holy Prophet (s.a.w) saying when he said :-
Sahih Muslim Book 19, Number 4483:
Narrated Jabir ibn Samurah:
It has been narrated on the authority of Amir ibn
Sa'd ibn AbuWaqqas who said: I wrote (a letter) to Jabir ibn
Samurah and sent it to him through my servant, Nafi', asking
him to inform me of something he had heard from the
Messenger of Allah (peace_be_upon_him). He wrote to me (in
reply): I heard the Messenger of Allah (peace_be_upon_him)
say on Friday, the day on which al-Aslami was stoned to
death (for committing adultery): The Islamic religion will
continue until the Hour has been established, or you have
been ruled by twelve Caliphs, all of them being from the
Quraysh. I also heard him say: A small force of the Muslims
will capture the white palace, the palace of the Persian
Emperor or his descendants. I also heard him say: Before the
Day of Judgment there will appear (a number of) imposters.
You are to guard against them. I also heard him say: When
God grants wealth to any one of you, he should first spend
it on himself and his family (and then give it in charity to
the poor). I heard him (also) say: I shall be your
forerunner at the Cistern (expecting your arrival).
Sunan Abu Dawud Book 36, Number 4266:
Narrated Jabir ibn Samurah:
The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: The religion
will continue to be established till there are twelve
caliphs over you, and the whole community will agree on each
of them. I then heard from the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him)
some remarks which I could not understand. I asked my
father: What is he saying: He said: all of them will belong
You can also find in Sahih Tirmizi and Yanabee ul-Mawadata
vol 3 page 105.
Who are these twelve Khalifa, did our Holy Prophet (s.a.w)
left us to guess their names without informing us?
According to this hadith the Holy Prophet (s.a.w) did not
mention who are these 12 Khalifa. Therefore the Muslims
started to guess and name anyone who can fit and suit them,
even the murder of the Sayyid Shababe Ahle Jana – the master
of the youth of Paradise (Imam Hussain a.s) is included in
We know that our Prophet (s.a.w) is the last of the prophets
and who brought COMPLETE MESSAGE from God,
would it be difficult for him
to mention those twelve Khalifa by name and leave in the
hands of Muslim to guess just like Christians?
WHERE IN THE HOLY QURAN EVER MENTION THAT THE IMPORTANT
SELECTION OF KHILAFA OR IMAM ARE IN THE HAND OF HUMAN BEING,
PLEASE PROVIDE ONE VERSE FOR ME IT IS ENOUGH.
Ahle Sunnah Sects and Imams
Before the appearance of those schools and groups, such as
Al-Ash’ari, Mutazalite, Hanafi, Shafi, Maliki, Hanbali,
Jaafari, Zaydi, Ibadhi and other, what would be the status
of those Muslims who did not get chance to follow them, in
which sects would they be?
If only one group out of 73 will go to paradise, then surely
only one group of Ahlel Sunnah out of four
(Hanafi, Shafi, Maliki and Hanbali ) should be the
success one as far as the Law concern because all of them
have different interpretation of Sunnah of the Holy Prophet
(s.a.w). The question is
which one out of these four groups are the success one?
If only one sect out of
4 of Sunni sects would be a success one, where the
other 3 groups of Ahle Sunna will be?
If one group out of 73 will go to paradise, then surely one
group of Ahlel Sunna out of two (Ashaari and Hanbali) as far
as the Doctrine concern because all of them have different
interpretation of Sunnah of the Holy Prophet (s.a.w).
The question is which one out
of these two groups are the success one?
Where another group out of these two groups of Ahle Sunna
Where can we find that any of these Imams ever said that ‘I
am the most learned man of the Holy Prophet (s.a.w) Ummat
and Muslims have to follow me!’
On whose authority should we follow them, the authority of
the Holy Prophet (s.a.w) or God, and where can we find their
names if their names ever mentioned by them?
If they were selected by men, how can we trust those men who
Why should we only chose those four selected Imams and
reject other great Imams who came during their time and
after them such as Imam Sufyan Sauri, Imam Sufyan ibne
Ainiya, Ibne Jareeh, Imam Ghazali, and others?
Also do you mean to say that those Imams like as Imam Sufyan
Sauri, Imam Sufyan ibne Ainiya, Ibne Jareeh, Imam Ghazali,
Imam Jaafar Sadiq (who taught Abu Hanifa and Malik) and
others WERE NOT GREAT? What is your proof that ONLY THESE
FOUR IMAMS WERE GREAT?
If you are true in your words and say that we should not
reject Imam Sufyan Sauri, Imam Sufyan ibne Ainiya, Ibne
Jareeh, Imam Ghazali and others then
why are you STICKING WITH THESE
FOUR IMAMS ONLY?
Tell me if the early Muslims did survive without these four
Imams then what was necessary for these Imams:
Wahabi who came from the offshot of Hanbal are another new
sect, where would they stand?
There are several books written by scholars of Ahlel Sunna
Who allowed the door of Ijtehad to be closed, Holy Prophet (s.w.a),
God or man, if man on whose authority?
In case of the advance technology,
how can we cope with new
regulations if the door of Ijtehad is closed when we are
only suppose to follow those four Imams?
Tell me were all early Muslims believed that God can be seen
like Hanbal or not believed like rest of three schools?
Tell me were all early Muslims doing Qunut at the morning
like Shafi and Malik or they were not doing like Hanafi and
Tell me were all early Muslims folding their hands like
three schools or not folding like Malik?
In Bukhari we learn from Imran that the Aya 4:24 regarding
Muta WAS NEVER ABROGATED so Muta should have been forbidden!
Volume 6, Book 60, Number 43:
Narrated 'Imran bin Husain:
The Verse of Hajj-at-Tamatu was revealed in Allah's Book, so
we performed it with Allah's Apostle, and nothing was
revealed in Qur'an to make it illegal, nor did the Prophet
prohibit it till he died. But the man (who regarded it
illegal) just expressed what his own mind suggested.
See the original Arabic Bukhari is written as : “Anzalta
Ayatul MUTA FI KITABILLAH” See book 3 page 105 but in
English it has been changed from the word MUTA TO HAJJ-AT-
TAMATU, typical Christian style of changing their Bible!
The only person to make MUTA AS UNLAWFUL WAS NOBODY ELSE
EXCEPT OMAR WHO SAID, “TWO TYPES OF MUT’A WERE (LEGAL)
DURING THE TIME OF THE PROPHET AND I FORBID THEM BOTH, and I
punish those who commit it. They are: Mut'a of pilgrimage
and Mut'a of women.”
See Tafsir al-Kabir, by al-Fakhr al-Razi, volum 3,
page 201 under verse 4:24; Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, volume
1, page 52 and Al-Mughani by Ibnu Quddama volume 7 page 572.
Also Bukahri confirm that it was Omar who MADE UNLAWFUL WHAT
WAS MADE LAWFUL BY ALLAH
How can Omar prohibit something which the messenger of Allah